Adams faces court grilling over IRA ties in civil case
Mark Hennessy, Ireland Correspondent, Irish Times, March 7th, 2026
Former Sinn Féin leader’s long history of denials of IRA membership will come under the spotlight in a London court next week
Thirty years on, Jonathan Ganesh still dreams about the Algerian man, Zaoui Berezag, who had gone to South Quay Plaza in London’s Docklands on February 9th, 1996 to clean offices in the Midlands Bank.
After finishing his work, Berezag was sitting in his car outside a newsagent’s shop. Also next to the shop was a parked truck containing a bomb left by the IRA. It exploded at 7.01pm.
“I thought he was dead. His brain was hanging out, his skull had gone,” Ganesh remembers, speaking during a break on a night shift in the London hospital where he now works as a psychotherapist.
Berezag, who was left brain-damaged, blind and paralysed, needed round-the-clock care at home for 20 years from his wife, Gemma, and other family members, before dying in a nursing home in 2018.
Ganesh was badly injured in the explosion, which ended the 1994 IRA ceasefire. The blast killed his friends Inam Ul-Haq Bashir and John Jeffries. More than 100 people were injured, many seriously.
On Monday, Ganesh and John Clark, who was injured in the IRA’s 1973 bombing of the Old Bailey in London, and Barry Laycock, who was injured in the IRA’s 1996 bombing of the Arndale Shopping Centre in Manchester, are taking a civil case at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.
Seeking £1 in nominal damages, the three will argue that the former president of Sinn Féin, Gerry Adams, “acted with others in furtherance of a common design to bomb the British mainland”.
The men’s lawyers will argue that the now 77-year-old Adams, a former TD and MP, was “directly responsible” in a variety of roles within the IRA for the decisions to plant the bombs.
The three had wanted to sue him as a representative of the IRA, but two years ago British judge Michael Soole ruled that out, saying the IRA was not “a legal entity”, although he allowed the claims made against Adams personally to continue.
The legal action, which began in 2022, was prompted by the decision of the Conservative government to introduce legacy legislation that would have blocked all legal actions relating to incidents in the Troubles, Northern Ireland’s three-decade conflict.
The legislation was largely intended by the Conservatives to end cases against soldiers and police officers, but Ganesh and his fellow claimants were spurred into action when they realised that it would also cover republicans.
Since then, the three have raised nearly £110,000 (€126,000) to pay for the case.
“There were a few large donations, but most of the money has come in fivers, some in twos and threes. Some in euros too,” says Ganesh.
Legal Safety Net
Two years ago, Adams lost an application to have the three pay his legal costs if he wins. Usually, losers pay the winner’s costs, but the judge ruled against Adams, effectively granting the three a safety net.
Adams has always denied ever having been a member of the IRA and has never been convicted of IRA membership. He was charged with the offence in 1977, but the case was dropped months later because of insufficient evidence.
In 2014, he was held for four days by the Police Service of Northern Ireland on the back of claims made in the Boston College tapes by deceased IRA members Brendan Hughes and Dolours Price.
The two had parted ways with Adams over ending the IRA’s campaign long before they died in 2008 and 2013 respectively. They had alleged that Adams was involved in the 1972 kidnapping and murder of Belfast widow and mother of 10 Jean McConville.
The four days of questioning were condemned by Sinn Féin’s Martin McGuinness as “political policing”. Later, the Public Prosecution Service in Belfast said there was insufficient evidence for a prosecution as it considered the Hughes/Price allegations to be hearsay.
In 1983 Adams threatened to sue The Irish Times for “the monstrous libel” of describing him as “Provisional IRA vice-president” instead of “Provisional Sinn Féin vice-president”. His solicitors complained of what they considered to be a grossly unfounded libel; they claimed he was not then – and never had been – a member of the IRA and that their client had suffered a “grave injury” to his character.
That same year, Adams complained strongly over an edition of ITV’s World In Action called The Honourable Member for Belfast West, which alleged that he had become “the shogun” of the republican movement.
He has challenged public assertions that he was an IRA member many times since, unlike the late McGuinness, his long-time republican colleague, though McGuinness was convicted of IRA membership.
Last year, Adams denied under oath in a High Court defamation action in Dublin that he was a member of the IRA, when he sued the BBC over claims made in its Spotlight programme that he had authorised the killing of IRA informer Denis Donaldson in 2006.
He won that case, and was awarded €100,000 in damages, which he split between Unicef, GAA clubs, and homelessness and suicide prevention organisations in Belfast, and a republican prisoners’ support group.
Although it had the opportunity, the BBC did not appeal the verdict.
Adams’s long-time denial of IRA membership is regarded by many in the republican community – loosely defined – as being a slightly unfortunate, uncomfortable, but nevertheless pragmatic action.
Others are less forgiving, however.
‘Lack of credibility’
Former president of republican Sinn Féin (RSF) Des Dalton said Adams has “carefully constructed a narrative over a long number of years”, but has now “painted himself into a corner”.
Saying that Adams suffers from “a complete lack of credibility”, Dalton, who led RSF from 2009 to 2018, but is no longer a member, told The Irish Times: “It’s quite insulting to a lot of people who did take part in the struggle.
“In the beginning, there was a practical element to all of this, I suppose. But Ruairí Ó Brádaigh [a former president of republican Sinn Féin] had a very simple way of dealing with questions like that, saying: ‘We do not discuss those matters.’ He could have done the same,” Dalton says of Adams.
The history of the Troubles shows Adams’s associations, argues Dalton, pointing to the former Sinn Féin president’s presence at the 1972 Cheyne Walk talks in London with Northern Ireland secretary Willie Whitelaw, when an IRA delegation travelled to meet British government officials.
Seán MacStiofáin, the then IRA chief of staff, made clear that an IRA delegation went to Cheyne Walk: “Seán Ó Bradaigh, Sinn Féin’s director of publicity, wanted to go and was firmly told no,” Dalton recalls.
The case that begins on Monday before Judge Michael Soole will hear testimony from up to 14 witnesses.
The list includes at least one former member of the IRA, and possibly two. Two witnesses have been given court-ordered anonymity, though this was challenged by Adams’s counsel, Edward Craven KC.
He argued that there was no evidence of any real, or immediate risk to life, or serious harm if they were identified, adding that one of the two – known as Witness B – has long commented publicly on matters concerning Northern Ireland.
If they had “held genuine and objectively well-founded fears for their safety if their identities were to become public” that would have been clear from their witness statements, the lawyer argued, unsuccessfully.
The case will involve Adams making his first appearance in a London court, when he will likely face the former director of public prosecutions for England and Wales, Max Hill KC.
Carefully nurtured image
The case matters greatly to Adams, who has carefully nurtured his image and reputation, especially in the United States where he remains his party’s single biggest draw when it raises funds there.
Addressing an Irish-American audience last month in a column in the New York-based Irish Echo, he said the claim now being taken by Ganesh, Laycock and Clark was “unorthodox”.
“I regret all the deaths and injuries. People are entitled to use the law. However, this case is brought decades after these incidents and decades after the Good Friday Agreement brought peace to us all,” Adams wrote.
A number of former British army and RUC/PSNI witnesses “will give hearsay evidence that because I was a senior republican during the conflict I must be responsible for these specific events”, he wrote.
“I had no direct or indirect involvement in these explosions and I will robustly challenge the unsubstantiated hearsay statements that are the mainstay of the claimants’ case.”
Just days before the case begins, the documentary A Ballymurphy Man, which traces Adams’s life and career – and which he co-operated in the making of over five years – will be released on various streaming services.
Asked about the likely consequences of the case, Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin, of DCU, said historians operated “on the working assumption” that Adams had been a member of the IRA.
A court ruling laying that down in tablets of legal stone could “embolden” some historians and writers to strengthen their findings on Adams in future histories of The Troubles, he said.
If Adams wins, the victory will, for republicans, join last year’s legal victory against the BBC, which, Adams claimed afterwards, had “put manners” on an organisation that “upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland”.
If he loses, his supporters will likely argue that no Irish republican could have expected justice in a British court from a British judge. Perhaps rehearsing this line, Adams wrote in his Irish Echo column: “This civil action has support from British forces veterans, English Tories, the DUP, other unionist parties and elements of the Loyal Orders.”
However, the international publicity a defeat would bring would place both Adams and Sinn Féin on the back foot and raise the prospect that others might follow the lead of Ganesh, Clark and Laycock.
For Des Dalton, however, there is an element of weariness about it all.
“To be honest, I had not realised that the case was beginning next week. It’s just another occasion where Gerry Adams says he wasn’t in the IRA,” he said.
“His attitude is almost Orwellian, but the accepted version of history matters to him, and to Sinn Féin. That’s what all of this is about: winning the battle of history of The Troubles.”
For Ganesh, a distant relation of Éamon de Valera through his Bruree, Co Limerick-born mother, Patricia Coll, the case is being taken for all those no longer able to have their voices heard.
“Those killed, those who died in pain with their injuries, those who committed suicide – and there have been more of those than people know. Too many people, too much pain,” he said.
“It’s been a very long journey. It has not been easy for us, not been easy at all. Many people thought we wouldn’t be able to get this far. But it was very important that we did.”
Unionists slam Sinn Fein TD who claimed bombing never solved anything
GABRIELLE SWAN, Belfast Telegraph, Match 7th, 2025
A Sinn Fein politician has been lambasted after claiming that bombing never solved anything, while discussing the crisis in the Middle East.
Matt Carthy, a TD for Cavan-Monaghan, was speaking on Virgin's Tonight Show about the attacks on Iran by the US and Israeli military.
The comment was branded “astounding” by DUP MLA Trevor Clarke, who pointed to the IRA's bombing campaign which Sinn Fein politicians regularly refuse to condemn.
First Minister Michelle O'Neill previously claimed there was “no alternative” to IRA violence during the Troubles.
Former Westminster Security Minister and Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat said Mr Carthy's comment was “extraordinary”.
Mr Carthy was speaking in the context of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.
The TD told the programme: “The UN isn't perfect, but it is the only hope humanity has and therefore I think that it is critically important for independent neutral states [to] actually adhere to and protect our neutrality and become voices globally for conflict resolution.
“There isn't an instance where bombing a country ended up resulting in a better situation, particularly the type of attacks that we are seeing in Iran.
“We can look at Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, there are multiple examples where Israel and US interventions have destabilised their regions, and it is happening again.”
Afterwards, Mr Clarke asked if the TD would like “to let the Sinn Fein MLAs (who are) convicted IRA bombers at Stormont know this”, in reference to the 30-year-long bombing campaign in Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK during the Troubles.
Sinn Fein MLAs Pat Sheehan, Gerry Kelly and Caral Ni Chuilin have convictions in relation to bombing.
Mr Clarke referenced a previous interview in 2022, in which Ms O'Neill said there was no alternative to IRA violence, and a remark from former Sinn Fein MP Michelle Gildernew on a BBC podcast last year that some murders during the Troubles were justified.
Mr Clarke suggested Mr Carthy should speak to “our 'no alternative to IRA bombings' First Minister”.
“Maybe he could stop by Fermanagh and explain to the 'murder was justified' former Sinn Fein MEP, MP and MLA Michelle Gildernew,” he added.
‘16,000 bombs’
“Condemning the bombing of Tehran while saying there was no alternative to planting 16,000 bombs across Northern Ireland is astounding.
“I welcome this course correction by Matt Carthy; hopefully, he extends this commentary to the actions of his party members.”
Mr Tugendhat, meanwhile, took to X to brand Mr Carthy's comments as “extraordinary”.
“For a man in a party governed by the Army Council who, you know, bombed a lot of people, this is frankly extraordinary,” he wrote.
“I know Sinn Fein pretend they've forgotten their murdered victims, but we should not.”
This is not the first time Mr Carthy has been criticised for comments.
In April 2021, he said Provisional IRA member Séamus McElwain was “still held in huge esteem” and “fondly remembered by all who knew him” at a commemoration.
McElwain was shot dead by the SAS in Roslea, Co Fermanagh, in April 1986. He had been attempting to ambush a patrol.
He was also suspected of at least 10 killings and has been blamed for the near fatal gun attack on John Kelly, the father of former DUP leader and First Minister, Arlene Foster.
“Séamus McElwain was only 26 years of age when he was killed in his own country by foreign occupying forces,” the TD said at the 35th anniversary of his death.
“Séamus is still held in huge esteem, very fondly remembered by all who knew him and by a new generation of people from Co Monaghan and Fermanagh and by Irish republicans of all ages.
“Séamus and all of those who fought for Irish freedom continue to inspire us.”
Sinn Fein has been contacted for a response.
TUV fails to stop republican commemoration in Belfast City Hall
MICHAEL KENWOOD, Irish News, March 7th, 2026
THE TUV has failed in an attempt to prevent this year’s Easter Lily launch happening at Belfast City Hall.
The campaign launch has been held in Belfast City Hall previously in 2024 and 2025 by the Belfast National Graves Association.
The event commemorates Irish republicans who died in conflict for Irish sovereign independence. The Easter Lily is worn as a symbol of remembrance for those who died in the 1916 Easter Rising.
At the March meeting of the full Belfast City Council at City Hall, elected representatives by a majority vote approved the event for City Hall on March 24. The committee document says the event amounts to “a reception and speeches focusing on local history” and will accommodate up to 80 people.
In the City Hall vote on a TUV proposal not to hold the event, 17 elected representatives voted in favour, from the unionist parties, while 26 voted against the proposal from Sinn Féin, the SDLP and People Before Profit. The Alliance Party and the Green Party abstained from the vote.
TUV Councillor Ron Mc-Dowell said at the council meeting: “This is an annual event that commemorates active service members of the IRA, and I don’t believe it is something we should be facilitating on Section 75 and Good Relations grounds, within Belfast City Council.
“When I think of the IRA, and I can think of many things, but what I think is about the disappeared, those who were abducted from their homes and tortured, and buried in a shallow grave. I think of Jean McConville, who was dragged screaming from her home, and atrocities on the Shankill, where Thomas Begley killed those innocent civilians, and the Bayardo bomb attack in my own constituency.”
Listing a further series of atrocities from the Troubles period, he said: “I reiterate I don’t think this is an event that we should be holding within this council.”
What aboutery
Sinn Féin group leader Councillor Ciarán Beattie replied at the meeting: “You have listed people killed by the IRA, you haven’t mentioned the other several thousand people that were killed. A lot of them were killed by loyalists, the British Army, the RUC.
“All people have their dead who they remember. Every year outside this building there are commemorations for the RUC and the British Army, the same organisation that murdered people in the streets of Ballymurphy and New Lodge and shot children in the face with plastic bullets. That is the experience in this city.
“If you have a problem with one particular group, then have a problem with them all because if you don’t, you are being selective.
“If you look at other events (that we will be hosting) – the Belfast Bands Forum wouldn’t be our cup of tea, or one we would like to support. But we recognise that is the culture and history for one section of society in this city. We have to recognise there are also other communities in this city, and we have to welcome them all.”
'I forgive the bombers, but my family never recovered':
Nephew of IRA blast victim on 50 years of devastation
SUZANNE BREEN, Belfast Telegraph, March 7th, 2026
AHEAD OF A STORMONT EVENT MARKING THOSE IMPACTED BY TERRORISM, PASTOR STEPHEN THOMPSON OPENS UP ON THE KILLING THAT DROVE HIS LOVED ONES FROM THEIR HOME AND TRIGGERED A SERIES OF OTHER TRAGEDIES
The nephew of a young mother killed in an IRA firebomb in Ballymena 50 years ago has spoken for the first time about how her murder “decimated” his family, with some members never recovering from the devastation.
Yvonne Dunlop burned to death after the device exploded in Alley Katz boutique in Bridge Street in October 1976.
She had shouted a warning to her nine-year-old son, Dennis, who was blown through the shop window with his hair on fire.
One of the bombers, Tom McElwee from Bellaghy, had previously worked in Ballymena as an apprentice mechanic. He died on hunger strike in the H-Blocks five years after the attack.
European Victims of Terrorism Day
Ms Dunlop's nephew, Pastor Stephen Thompson, will share her story on Monday at an event in Stormont hosted by the TUV to mark European Victims of Terrorism Day.
Mr Thompson told the Belfast Telegraph that, after years of anger, he forgives those who killed his aunt. But he said his family never recovered from being “turned upside down” by the IRA.
“Yvonne was just 27 years old. She left behind three young sons. Violence doesn't end when the act itself is over. It travels through generations. It spreads outwards — to children, to siblings, to grandparents,” he said.
“The Troubles aren't distant and clinical for us. Yvonne's death devastated our family. It created a wound that didn't simply heal with time. It changed the course of our lives in ways we could never have imagined.”
The IRA planted 16 firebombs in shops in Ballymena on Saturday, October 9, 1976, causing widespread damage.
One exploded in Alley Katz boutique, where Ms Dunlop had been working.
“It was my granny Mabel's wee shop,” Mr Thompson said.
“She loved her fashion. Yvonne was working that day. It was near the end of her shift, and granny was due to take over. Two women came into the shop. They went into the changing room — a small space with a curtain pulled around it.
She went in to check to check if customer had left anything behind
“When they left, Yvonne went in. She hadn't been suspicious of them, she always went in to check after every customer in case they had left something behind.
“The women had left a shopping bag. Yvonne looked inside and saw the device. She shouted 'There's a bomb. Get out!'
“Dennis was blown through the window. His hair was on fire. The pharmacist next door put it out. Alley Katz burst into flames. Yvonne didn't stand a chance.”
Mr Thompson was 10 years old when his aunt was killed.
“Yvonne was a warm, kind-hearted person,” he recalled.
“She had a huge heart, which was full of love. She adored animals and children. She was a great mother. She was always bringing stray dogs into the house.
“I remember my daddy crying his eyes out for his dead wee sister. I remember opening my granny's door to find Ian Paisley standing there. As the local MP, he had come to pay his condolences.
“After the funeral, there wasn't much talk about Yvonne's murder in our house. My parents wanted to protect us. Where we lived in Antrim hadn't really been touched by the Troubles. I knew nothing about sectarianism or politics.”
Despite the facade of normality, Mr Thompson's parents were struggling emotionally.
“The following year, they made the decision to move to Nottingham,” he said.
“They said what had happened meant they couldn't stay in Northern Ireland any longer. My daddy said that leaving was the only way for him to breathe again. We left the day that I was meant to go to big school.
“I helped load a van with all our belongings as my mates walked in their new uniforms to school.”
Mr Thompson described as “hell” the family's next five years in Nottingham.
“It was an emergency move. We lived with a relative over there in a tiny bedsit,” he said.
“There was just one room for all of us. That was our new home. Daddy was a salesman, but work wasn't always easy to find. We lived off Smash instant mashed potatoes and tins of beans. We had nothing.
“Eventually, we got a house in an estate, but it was a very rough place. Myself, my sister Marlene, and my brother Mark had lost all our friends.
“Life was much harder in Nottingham than it had been in Antrim. We had fields in Antrim, now we were living in the inner city. I remember one miserable Christmas after another.”
Mr Thompson said that his mother was very unhappy, but the change was even worse for his 12-year-old sister.
“Marlene couldn't settle. She fell in with a bad crowd and got caught up with drugs,” he explained.
“I remember dealers coming to the door and threatening daddy over money she owed. Once, when he was grabbed by the collar, I jumped in to save him. It was a horrendous time.
A legacy of suffering
“Marlene became addicted, and that led to her death many years later. Her problems began in Nottingham. I believe her life would have turned out very differently had we never gone there.
“We had left Northern Ireland to escape one form of suffering, only to encounter another. Trauma does not respect geography.”
In 1981 — the year that 10 republican hunger strikers would die in the H-Blocks — Mr Thompson's parents decided to come home.
“Despite everything, Northern Ireland still held meaning, identity and connection for us,” he said.
“It was another sudden decision by my parents. I was just months away from sitting my O-levels when we returned, and the syllabus here was entirely different. It was like heaven being home, but we had nowhere to live. We stayed in a B&B while we waited for a house.”
In August of that year, Mr Thompson's three cousins — Dennis, Terry, and Geoffrey — went to London to meet Ken Livingstone.
After McElwee's death, the Labour leader of the Greater London Council had described him as “not a criminal but a freedom fighter”.
However, the boys became so upset during a discussion on their mother's killing that they were unable to speak to Livingstone, and were taken on a tour of the council building instead.
McElwee and two other IRA members had been arrested on the day of the firebomb attack in Ballymena after a device they were transporting exploded prematurely in their car.
The 18-year-old republican lost an eye, while the second IRA man lost part of his leg and the third lost toes. McElwee was sentenced to 20 years for Ms Dunlop's murder. The charge was reduced to manslaughter on appeal, although the original jail term remained.
After 62 days without food in the H-Blocks, he became the ninth hunger striker to die. In his last written words, he asked for “forgiveness for everyone”.
Ms Dunlop's children had moved in with their grandparents following her killing.
“I don't know how my granny Mabel coped, but she did,” Mr Thompson said.
“After raising six kids of her own, she brought up Yvonne's three boys. I never once heard her complain. My granddad, Nat, died a few years later.
“They said it was from a heart attack, but we said it was from a broken heart because he had never got over losing Yvonne. The pain of burying his own child had marked him permanently.
“And the ripple effect of one murder didn't end with him. Yvonne's eldest son, Dennis, who had been blown through the shop window, also passed away long before his time. His was a life shaped by circumstances that no child should ever face.”
Yvonne's loss is keenly felt to this day.
“Her absence isn't something confined to anniversaries or memories,” Mr Thompson said.
“It's present in everyday moments — family gatherings where her chair is empty, conversations that carry her name, milestones she never saw.
“We weren't a bitter family but, as I grew up, I developed a lot of anger towards the bombers, and that rage is still there in some sections of our family.”
Forgiveness
Mr Thompson was previously a Methodist minister in north Belfast, working on cross-community projects with Fr Martin Magill.
He is now a pastor with Truth Revealed Ministries and a counsellor offering support to addicts. “I came from a good home, but we weren't practising Christians. Coming to faith in adulthood helped me forgive the bombers. I didn't do that for them, but for me.
“It was for my own head and heart. I realised that carrying anger indefinitely let the terrorists still terrorise. It consumed so much mental and emotional energy. Forgiveness lifted a weight that I had carried for too long. It was an act of freedom which brought me peace.”
The Stormont event hosted by the TUV to mark European Victims of Terrorism Day will also hear from Travis Dylan Frain, who survived the 2017 Westminster Bridge attack; Denise Mullen, whose dad Denis was killed by the UVF's Glenanne Gang in 1975; and John Sproule, whose brother Ian was shot dead by the IRA near Castlederg in 1991.
As the 50th anniversary of his aunt's murder approaches, Mr Thompson said it was the right time for him to speak about her.
“I want people to remember how Yvonne lived: that she mattered, that she was loved. Her life had meaning far beyond the violence that ended it. Victims are much more than the way they died.”
‘Stand-off’ over Glenanne Gang documents, court told
ALAN ERWIN, Irish News, March 7th, 2026
THE Secretary of State is allegedly trying to obtain a veto over any police disclosure of sensitive documents in civil actions by relatives of loyalist paramilitary murder victims, the High Court heard yesterday.
Counsel for two bereaved families claimed a dispute between Hilary Benn and Chief Constable Jon Boutcher about handling issues of potential national security could further delay the cases.
The development came as lawyers representing the Secretary of State confirmed he is seeking to intervene in lawsuits centred on alleged security force collusion with the terrorist killers.
Eugene Reavey is suing the PSNI and Ministry of Defence for misfeasance in public office in connection with the murder of his three brothers 50 years ago.
John Martin, Brian and Anthony Reavey were shot dead by masked intruders at the family’s home in
Whitecross, south Armagh in January 1976. Known as the Glenanne Gang, the UVF unit at the centre of the action is believed to have been responsible for up to 120 deaths in a sustained killing spree at the height of the Troubles. The unit allegedly contained members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Ulster Defence Regiment.
Mr Reavey’s case is part of a wider group of litigation brought by families of victims and those wounded in the series of Troubles-era murders and attempted murders.
A second action relates to the double murder of GAA fans Sean Farmer and Colm McCartney at a dummy roadblock in Altnamackin, Co Armagh in August 1975.
With both cases hit by a series of delays related to the disclosure of sensitive documents by the defendants, Mr Justice Rooney has repeatedly insisted the trials will get underway next month.
UK Govt and PSNI at odds
However, it emerged yesterday that the UK government and the Chief Constable are in disagreement about a Public Interest Immunity (PII) process for redacting material on grounds of national security.
Based on a Supreme Court judgment, lawyers for the Secretary of State argued that he should oversee any PII claim over documents to be provided by the PSNI.
The Chief Constable should also seek a ministerial certificate on the issue in all cases involving national security, it was contended.
Counsel representing Mr Boutcher, Oliver Sanders KC, indicated police have made their own PII claims since a previous practice was abandoned two years ago. He described the latest development as an impasse between the PSNI and the government.
“What the NI Office is now seeking, to some extent, is more control over the process,” he added.
Despite the dispute, Mr Sanders insisted the relationship between the Chief Constable and the Secretary of State remains amicable.
But a barrister for the Reavey and Farmer families said he had been left bemused by a disagreement between two branches of the state.
Desmond Fahy KC submitted: “It seems that what is being attempted here is the introduction of a veto on the part of the Secretary of State by invoking national security.”
He argued that government representatives had shown no interest in either family in the 50 years since their loved ones were murdered.
“Here we are, a matter of weeks before the hearings… and the Secretary of State is seeking to intervene in a process ongoing for 18 months or two years on the basis there are issues of national security,” he said.
Stressing the Ministry of Defence’s role as a defendant in the two actions, he claimed the government would have known about the PII process and voiced concern over any potential further hold-ups.
“A stand-off between the Secretary of State and Chief Constable… is going to introduce delay in this process,” the barrister predicted.
Mr Justice Rooney stated: “I don’t want these matters delayed yet again because of a dispute between the Secretary of State and the Chief Constable. It just can’t happen.”
Man charged with 1979 murder of UDR member has bail terms varied
ASHLEIGH MCDONALD, Belfast Telegraph, March 7th, 2026
JAMES DONEGAN WILL BE ALLOWED TO RETURN TO LIVE IN CO CAVAN HOME
A bid to vary the bail of a Co Cavan man accused of murdering a part-time UDR member over four decades ago has been granted.
James Donegan (68), of Bruce Manor, Arvagh, has been charged with murdering Joseph Porter on a date between June 22 and 25, 1979.
Mr Porter (64), a farmer, was shot close to his home at Creggan Road in Mountnorris, Co Armagh.
As well as murdering Mr Porter, Donegan has also been charged with possessing a firearm with intent and being a member of the IRA on the same dates. The accused denies all the charges.
Currently on bail and residing with a female relative in south Armagh, a bid to vary Donegan's bail to allow him to return to Co Cavan was made to Judge Gordon Kerr KC.
Opposing the application, a Crown barrister raised concerns about a risk of flight. He said following Mr Porter's murder the IRA claimed responsibility.
He said the evidence against Donegan falls into three strands: The first is a fingerprint left at the scene which matched the accused.
The second is “bad character evidence” arising from Donegan being arrested following a shooting in Co Louth in 1981 which resulted in his serving a prison sentence.
The third arose from an interview conducted in March 2017 with An Garda Siochana, when he was questioned about Mr Porter's murder.
‘Legitimate target’
The prosecutor told Judge Kerr: “In that interview, he did make comment. He said he had been a soldier in the war and that Mr Porter would have been a legitimate target as he was a member of the UDR.”
Donegan was extradited across the border last April and granted bail later that month.
One of the conditions imposed was that Donegan was to reside in Northern Ireland.
Citing concerns and objecting to the variation, the Crown barrister said Donegan was likely to receive a custodial sentence if convicted of the offences, which could be “an incentive to flee”.
He added: “As a member of the IRA previously, he has access, we say, still to a network which would assist him to flee, if he wished to use it.”
In response, Donegan's solicitor said the only issue of concern was whether or not his client would “turn up for his trial”.
Branding the case against Donegan “weak”, the solicitor said his client had a triple bypass in May 2024.
He added that while on bail Donegan “hasn't been able to avail of getting a GP in the south Armagh area”, and “since his operation he has not been seen by a doctor”.
The solicitor told Judge Kerr that since being granted bail last year, there “hasn't been a single breach”.
Addressing concerns about the risk of flight and not turning up for trial, the solicitor said “all the evidence tips to Mr Donegan meeting this case and turning up, as he had done”.
Donegan's solicitor said a bail variation would allow him “to return to his home, where he can readily avail of medical support”.
Judge Kerr was told by the prosecution the nearest PSNI station is in Enniskillen. He was also told there could be reciprocal arrangements for Donegan to sign his bail at a Garda station.
At the judge's request, Donegan swore an oath on the Bible and confirmed to his solicitor his intentions to honour his bail conditions and turn up for his trial.
Judge Kerr said: “A bail order is a living thing in that it moves on with time, and to be effective, bail should reflect the circumstances involved.
“There is no doubt that the original bail address has turned out to be entirely impractical and has led to significant difficulties in terms of the conditions he has to stay in and impacts on members of his family.''
He added that Donegan could come north to sign his bail once a week at a designated PSNI station, “so that they can be sure of his whereabouts''.
“I also feel arrangements should be made with An Garda Siochana for him to sign at a local station on one occasion per week. Those signings should be spaced so that they cover the week effectively,” he said.
“With those conditions, I then consider it would be proper to allow this man bail. This is not a precedent I am setting. It is a reflection of the circumstances which apply practically in this case.”
As part of his bail variation, Donegan will no longer be electronically tagged, but will remain subject to a curfew.
A bid to vary the bail of a Co Cavan man accused of murdering a part-time UDR member over four decades ago has been granted.
James Donegan (68), of Bruce Manor, Arvagh, has been charged with murdering Joseph Porter on a date between June 22 and 25, 1979.
Mr Porter (64), a farmer, was shot close to his home at Creggan Road in Mountnorris, Co Armagh.
As well as murdering Mr Porter, Donegan has also been charged with possessing a firearm with intent and being a member of the IRA on the same dates. The accused denies all the charges.
Currently on bail and residing with a female relative in south Armagh, a bid to vary Donegan's bail to allow him to return to Co Cavan was made to Judge Gordon Kerr KC.
Opposing the application, a Crown barrister raised concerns about a risk of flight. He said following Mr Porter's murder the IRA claimed responsibility.
He said the evidence against Donegan falls into three strands: The first is a fingerprint left at the scene which matched the accused.
The second is “bad character evidence” arising from Donegan being arrested following a shooting in Co Louth in 1981 which resulted in his serving a prison sentence.
The third arose from an interview conducted in March 2017 with An Garda Siochana, when he was questioned about Mr Porter's murder.
The prosecutor told Judge Kerr: “In that interview, he did make comment. He said he had been a soldier in the war and that Mr Porter would have been a legitimate target as he was a member of the UDR.”
Donegan was extradited across the border last April and granted bail later that month.
One of the conditions imposed was that Donegan was to reside in Northern Ireland.
Citing concerns and objecting to the variation, the Crown barrister said Donegan was likely to receive a custodial sentence if convicted of the offences, which could be “an incentive to flee”.
He added: “As a member of the IRA previously, he has access, we say, still to a network which would assist him to flee, if he wished to use it.”
In response, Donegan's solicitor said the only issue of concern was whether or not his client would “turn up for his trial”.
Triple bypass
Branding the case against Donegan “weak”, the solicitor said his client had a triple bypass in May 2024.
He added that while on bail Donegan “hasn't been able to avail of getting a GP in the south Armagh area”, and “since his operation he has not been seen by a doctor”.
The solicitor told Judge Kerr that since being granted bail last year, there “hasn't been a single breach”.
Addressing concerns about the risk of flight and not turning up for trial, the solicitor said “all the evidence tips to Mr Donegan meeting this case and turning up, as he had done”.
Donegan's solicitor said a bail variation would allow him “to return to his home, where he can readily avail of medical support”.
Judge Kerr was told by the prosecution the nearest PSNI station is in Enniskillen. He was also told there could be reciprocal arrangements for Donegan to sign his bail at a Garda station.
At the judge's request, Donegan swore an oath on the Bible and confirmed to his solicitor his intentions to honour his bail conditions and turn up for his trial.
Judge Kerr said: “A bail order is a living thing in that it moves on with time, and to be effective, bail should reflect the circumstances involved.
“There is no doubt that the original bail address has turned out to be entirely impractical and has led to significant difficulties in terms of the conditions he has to stay in and impacts on members of his family.''
He added that Donegan could come north to sign his bail once a week at a designated PSNI station, “so that they can be sure of his whereabouts''.
“I also feel arrangements should be made with An Garda Siochana for him to sign at a local station on one occasion per week. Those signings should be spaced so that they cover the week effectively,” he said.
“With those conditions, I then consider it would be proper to allow this man bail. This is not a precedent I am setting. It is a reflection of the circumstances which apply practically in this case.”
As part of his bail variation, Donegan will no longer be electronically tagged, but will remain subject to a curfew.
Decision not to prosecute RUC officers totally ‘flawed’
ALAN ERWIN, Irish News, March 7th, 2026
A DECISION not to prosecute two police officers in connection with the killing of an IRA man was “irredeemably flawed”, the High Court heard yesterday.
Counsel for the mother of Pearse Jordan argued that the pair should have been charged with committing perjury at the inquest into his death. Senior judges were told that the Public Prosecution Service violated her human rights and breached its own code in determining they should not face a criminal trial.
“The PPS decision is irredeemably flawed,” Karen Quinlivan KC submitted.
Pearse Jordan, 22, was shot dead by an RUC officer as he ran from a stolen car stopped on the Falls Road in November 1992. His death was one of several high-profile cases in Northern Ireland involving allegations that police were involved in shoot-to-kill incidents.
In 2016 an inquest was unable to reach a concluded view about whether the use of lethal force was justified.
But the coroner, Mr Justice Horner, found that two former members of the RUC, Officers M and Q, had given untruthful evidence. Amid suspicions that one or both of them edited the original logbook on the day of the shooting, he concluded they may have committed perjury or tried to pervert the course of justice.
The coroner went on to report both officers to the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Insufficient evidence
In 2024, following a previous legal action, the PPS decided not to prosecute M and Q after concluding there was insufficient available evidence for a reasonable prospect of obtaining a conviction on any offence. Teresa Jordan, the IRA man’s mother, is seeking a judicial review in a bid to have that determination quashed.
Her legal team contend that it violated Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights and amounted to a breach of the PPS code for prosecutors. In what she described as a circumstantial case against the officers, Ms Quinlivan claimed there is a cumulative body of evidence from multiple credible sources to support the case for prosecutions.
She told the court it was difficult to comprehend how the PPS could safely reach any decision about the plausibility of the officers’ accounts without them being formally questioned.
“The PPS have erred in concluding that M and Q should not be interviewed under caution in respect of this matter,” counsel stated.
The case, being heard by a three-judge panel, continues next week.
Speaking outside court Mrs Jordan’s solicitor, Fearghal Shiels of Madden and Finucane, said: “We contend that the PPS took an extraordinary eight years to arrive at a decision not to prosecute the two officers… which is unlawful and failed to consider all of the available evidence.
“The PPS entirely failed to discharge its functions by directing that the officers concerned not be questioned under caution.
“We are asking the Court to quash the decision taken and declare it unlawful.”
‘I’ll give Lough Neagh away for free.. if our politicians can agree’
JOHN MANLEY, POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT, Irish News, March 7th, 2026
THE Earl of Shaftesbury has said he wants to do the “right thing” for Lough Neagh, including giving up for free his family’s stake in Ireland largest fresh water body.
But Nick Ashley-Cooper has told The Irish News that transferring the lough bed into community or trust ownership will not solve the ecological crisis that has led to huge swathes of toxic blue-green algae in recent summers.
He calls for a “consensus” from Stormont and the immediate establishment of an independent environmental protection agency, arguing “much more robust regulation enforcement needs to happen”.
The earl, whose family’s historic claim to the lough dates from the Ulster Plantation, says he is often cast as a “villain” in relation to the problems that have beset it, which are largely the result of pollution from agriculture, wastewater and septic tanks in the extensive catchment area.
“It’s easy to say everything that’s going wrong is because of this one individual landowner who happens to be an aristocrat, and he’s English, so he’s the super villain,” he said.
“That’s an easy story to sell – it’s an easy story for politicians to talk about.” In 2014, a Stormont working group concluded there was “no compelling grounds” for taking Lough Neagh into public ownership.
Efforts to explore community or trust ownership that previously stalled have gained fresh momentum through the ‘Forever Lough Neagh’ project, led by the National Trust, which has received public funding to look at long-term sustainability and community-based management. Mr Ashley-Cooper said he is “open to whatever is the right thing to do”, including relinquishing the Shaftesbury Estate’s stake in the lough for nothing.
“I’m not creating huge obstacles to this,” he insisted.
“I’ve made it clear that I want to do this but I want to make sure that it’s something that can really give back and be representative of all the different interests around Lough Neagh.”
However, the earl stressed that changing ownership “won’t influence much about the current problem”.
His name isn’t Earl – and he isn’t responsible for the Lough Neagh crisis
The Earl of Shaftesbury opens up about the circumstances that placed him in the eye of the Lough Neagh storm
The Earl’s first encounter with Lough Neagh
NICK Ashley-Cooper’s first encounter with Lough Neagh was 20 years ago. It was the Eton-educated 12th Earl of Shaftesbury’s first visit to the north and part of what was effectively a fact-finding mission, as he sought to get to grips with the responsibilities of the role into which he had suddenly been thrust.
He was in his mid-twenties at the time and months previous had been “living the dream” working as a DJ and club promoter in New York.
The Ashley-Cooper family own the bed of Western Europe’s largest fresh water body, along with the fishing and shooting rights, by virtue of a historic coupling with the Chichester family, who laid claim to the lough by violent means during the Ulster Plantation.
By his own admission, the genial aristocrat is cast by many as a “villain”, solely responsible for the ecological crisis that has become apparent at Lough Neagh in recent years, yet has been festering for decades.
He acknowledges a responsibility for the lough and believes he has a part to play in assisting its rehabilitation but quite correctly identifies its plight as having much broader, complex causes.
Speaking exclusively to The Irish News during a visit to Belfast, he recalls having “very little understanding of what was here in Northern Ireland and its connection to my family” when he first set eyes on the huge expanse of water.
He recounts the circumstances that turned his largely carefree lifestyle on its head in an almost matterof-fact manner, yet the sordidness and latter tragedy that saw him unexpectedly bestowed with a hereditary peerage cannot be understated.
“My father was an alcoholic, pretty much my whole life,” he says.
“His alcoholism was managed to a certain degree, up until the last eight years of his life or so when he eventually left home and things started to unravel quite quickly.”
In the early 2000s, Anthony Ashley-Cooper, the 10th Earl of Shaftesbury, was living on the Cote d’Azur, where he met Jamila M’Barek, a former casino hostess and a high-end sex worker. The pair were soon married, with the new bride assuming the title Countess of Shaftesbury.
“From the outside looking in, we could see that he was getting caught up with inappropriate people,” his son recalls.
“He was a very vulnerable person and people were taking advantage of that. It was a pretty desperate time, because we felt powerless to stop it.”
The couple’s relationship quickly deteriorated, leading the 66-year-old earl to seek a divorce. However, Anthony Ashley-Cooper was murdered in November 2004 in what is believed to have been a premeditated plot orchestrated by his estranged wife and her brother Mohammed M’Barek. His remains weren’t located for a further five months.
“There was an element of it that felt inevitable but it was still a complete shock,” recalls the present earl.
“When his body was found, we started to make headway and begin to understand the reasoning why. Eventually, his last wife was found guilty, along with her brother, so there was a sense of closure to what was a really long, tragic story.”
As is the tradition, the late earl’s title passed to his eldest son, also called Anthony.
However, a mere six months later the 27-year-old accountant was also dead, suffering a heart attack while visiting his younger brother and half siblings in New York.
“My half-sister was already living in New York, so Anthony had come over with my half-brother for this fantastic gig I’d lined up with a friend,” Nick Ashley-Cooper remembers.
“To this day, I think that’s one of the most poignant bits of the whole story, because when he died, we were all together and had spent that last day together having great fun.”
His elder brother’s untimely death was not only an emotional blow, it ultimately meant a change of life path.
“It knocked the whole family for six, and I just remember feeling that I wanted to step up, honour Anthony’s memory and do a good job, so pretty much straight away I decided to go back to England to be close to my mother and learn how I could help make a difference,” he says.
“Sure, I was really feeling happy with where I’d got to. I was living the dream and was travelling to and DJing in some great places but at the same time there was part of me that was wondering if it was a long-term career path.”
The newly-appointed earl also believed there was an opportunity “to turn the double tragedy into something positive”, including with the restoration of St Giles House, the family’s ancestral home since 1650, which had fallen into disrepair.
In 2010, under the guidance of the 12th Earl of Shaftesbury and his new wife Dinah, a project to bring the Grade 1 listed building back to life began. While restoration work remains ongoing, St Giles House, with its surrounding 5,500-acre estate, is now a wedding venue with accommodation, and various other attractions, while the Ashley-Coopers reside in an apartment in one wing of the house.
The successful restoration project, documented in a book entitled ‘The Rebirth of an English Country House’ co-written by the earl, stands in stark contrast to the corresponding deterioration of Lough Neagh, the bed of which generates income for a company owned by the Ashley-Coopers, thanks to a royalty paid on each tonne of sand extracted from the lough’s bed by five approved companies. The royalty is split 50/50 between Shaftesbury Estate of Lough Neagh Ltd and Northstone NI Ltd.
The sand extraction, which supports many businesses and jobs on the lough shore, went entirely unregulated for decades until 2021 when a handful of firms were licensed by the Department for Infrastructure to dredge up to 1.5 million tonnes annually.
Sand extraction limited to one per cent of Lough bed
According to the earl’s own figures, Shaftesbury Estate of Lough Neagh made an average profit of around £25,000-a-year in the decade up to 2022. He also insists there is no evidence that sand extraction, now officially limited to an area covering approximately 1% of the lough bed area, is causing environmental harm – or at the very least its impact is “exaggerated”.
It has not been directly linked to the huge swathes of toxic blue-green algae which have bloomed on Lough Neagh during recent summers, which is caused primarily by agricultural, wastewater and septic tank pollution, exacerbated by rising water temperatures and the presence of filter-feeding zebra mussels.
However, environmentalists believe the practice causes untold damage to the lough bed and its ecology. Agriculture and Environment Minister Andrew Muir has ordered a scientific review of Lough Neagh sand dredging, telling this newspaper in 2024 that if the review finds dredging is detrimental to the environment, he’ll “not be found wanting in terms of them making recommendations for action associated with that”.
MR Ashley-Cooper stresses that when it comes to the health of Lough Neagh, he and his family are blamed for matters far beyond their control.
‘I own a fraction of this whole system’
The earl also stresses that he personally does not own the lough bed, though he is a director of the company that does.
“To some extent, that sense of having to explain to people what we do and don’t control, and what we can and can’t do, has never stopped, and the misinformation has continued pretty much consistently,” he says.
I own a fraction of this whole system
“The bed of Lough Neagh isn’t Lough Neagh, and I think if we look at it holistically you see the lough as part of a huge system that incorporates the entire catchment, which is almost half of Northern Ireland. People might think I own Lough Neagh but I don’t; I own a fraction of this whole system and when thinking about solutions, you need to zoom out and look at the whole system, because looking at the bed on its own doesn’t achieve that.”
He also argues that sand, from wherever it is sourced, is integral to most if not all major infrastructure projects.
“No one’s come up with some other kind of aggregate that we can use for our buildings, for our roads, for our houses, so you have to decide if you stop doing it – and you might have very good reasons for stopping it – that you’re going to have to import sand from somewhere else, which from an environmental point of view is just deferring things,” he says.
“I take the view that the companies that are there have a legal right to be there. They’ve got all of their permissions in place and this has been something that’s been going on for many generations, it supports a lot of people, and I have no power to stop that. But if at some stage in the future it’s deemed that that shouldn’t continue, then it’ll be my job to ensure that it can’t continue.”
No-one can dispute that Mr Ashley-Cooper has been actively engaged in seeking a long-term solution for Lough Neagh, stressing that he’ll “listen to all the arguments”.
More than a decade ago, he engaged with the Stormont working group that in 2014 concluded there were “no compelling grounds” for taking the lough into public ownership. In its aftermath, the possibility of community ownership was explored though the momentum behind that process dwindled.
“Throughout this whole process, I’ve taken the view that it’s important for me to be fully engaged and not predetermine any outcomes. I’ve been acutely aware of the sensitivities and wanting to listen to all sides of the story before making the right choice for people living here and for the best interest of Loch Neagh.”
Having been closer than most to the process over two decades, it’s fair to assume the earl is across the options in terms of ownership and the lough’s future health.
He advocates either community ownership or a trust that oversees the parts of the lough estate that currently come under Shaftesbury Estate control. The earl has told The Irish News that he is happy to transfer ownership without compensation but is keen to ensure the circumstances of any transfer are in Lough Neagh’s best long-term interest.
While praising Andrew Muir, Mr Ashley-Cooper laments the current lack of political consensus when it comes to dealing with the lough’s algae crisis, along with the failure to establish an independent environmental protection agency to deliver the “much more robust regulation enforcement [that] absolutely needs to happen”.
Rather optimistically, he urges opposing sides in the arguments about who’s responsible for Lough Neagh and who’s responsible for the pollution to work together.
“Everyone’s used to staying in their own little fiefdoms, dealing with their own people and listening to their own views,” he says.
“I know it’s hard but we need to break down those barriers as a sort of prerequisite, and then people need to coalesce about one overall plan.”
A distinctle Groki version of Wikipedia
SAM MCBRIDE, NORTHERN IRELAND EDITOR, Belfast Telegraph, March 7th, 2026
FROM BLOODY SUNDAY TO RHI, GERRY ADAMS, BOBBY SANDS AND MICHAEL STONE, ELON MUSK'S GROKIPEDIA IS SPREADING DANGEROUS LIES IN MANY ARTICLES RELATING TO NI INVESTIGATION
How do you know what's true beyond your lived experience? We have maps and dictionaries and newspapers to explain elements of what we ourselves cannot prove.
But for longer than anyone reading this can remember, one of the most authoritative ways of understanding the world was through encyclopaedias. From school to university to the home, these multi-volume books have been a key source of knowledge for layperson and expert alike.
As the internet took off, Wikipedia emerged to dominate this sector. This vast experiment enabled anyone to write and edit articles.
While imperfect, it has surprisingly led to a highly reliable free encyclopaedia which generally sets out its sources, even if there have been errors and accusations of bias or manipulation by those with the money to pay lobbyists to get articles changed.
However, in that world, all of this was done by human beings. We are now in a dystopian age where machines tell us what is true, and increasingly our ability to know if they're right is being eroded.
Just a few months ago, tech billionaire Elon Musk set up a rival to Wikipedia — Grokipedia. It was thrown together hastily after Musk took a dislike to Wikipedia, claiming it was biased.
AI written
Grokipedia is modelled on Wikipedia and closely resembles its layout... but is AI-written. Already, it has more than six million articles. Many of these relate to Northern Ireland, and in almost every case I've examined, they contain staggering errors.
Some of these are trivial. Others are vastly more serious — rewriting history, defaming individuals and dangerously distorting the truth.
These falsehoods are hidden within long articles which are largely accurate. To someone without in-depth knowledge of the topics, they may take the view that if it is accurate 98% of the time, then it's probably accurate for the other 2%.
This makes these inaccuracies dangerously deceptive.
Take the article on the RHI scandal. This is a highly complex topic, yet the machine produces something which is overwhelmingly accurate — even if clunkily constructed, repetitious, painfully overwritten, and self-contradictory, as is true of every article I analysed.
But within this entry are significant errors. It claims that Arlene Foster introduced RHI cost controls in November 2015; in fact, it was Jonathan Bell.
It claims that when Stormont collapsed in 2017 it was replaced by direct rule (it wasn't), and refers to DETI official “Stephen Hutchinson” who doesn't exist; the relevant person was called Peter Hutchinson.
More seriously, it says that “witnesses like Donal Lunny from the Department of Finance noted farmers were unlikely to self-report overpayments”. Far from being a witness or a civil servant, Lunny was an inquiry barrister and is now chair of the Bar Council.
Another article claims loyalist activist Jamie Bryson — who it describes as a “legal commentator” and “author of political works” — attended two integrated schools and identifies as irreligious. On the contrary, Bryson attended state schools and has spoken about having a Christian faith.
It says Bryson has “consistently shielded” details of “any potential offspring from public scrutiny”, despite him regularly sharing photos of his son on social media.
An article on the DUP's deal with the Tories says party chairman Lord Morrow “resigned in protest” over the party's Brexit deal. He didn't, and remains in post.
Innumerate AI
That same article claims Northern Ireland voted 52% in favour of Brexit. It didn't; just 44% of people here voted for Brexit.
Another article says that the UUP won just seven Stormont seats in 2007, taking a paltry 6.2% of the vote. This is ludicrous. The UUP in that election polled more than double that figure — 14.9% — and took 18 seats.
The purported source of this claim is highly reputable — an article by The Irish Times' then northern editor Gerry Moriarty. But the newspaper article didn't get such a fundamental detail so wildly wrong.
Because of newspaper paywalls, many of the references cannot be checked by those without subscriptions, amplifying the danger. The cited source appears to be reliable, but if people could read the source they would see it didn't come close to saying what Grokipedia claims.
Grokipedia is no more accurate about this newspaper, describing the Belfast Telegraph as “Northern Ireland's longest-running daily newspaper” (we're old, but we're not that old). It claims that the News Letter is owned by Mediahuis (this paper's owner); it's not — it is owned by Iconic Media, an entirely unrelated entity.
Lots of this is maddeningly obtuse. But there are far more serious problems.
In an article on corruption in Northern Ireland, it says of the Nama scandal that “text messages revealed in August 2016 showed former Sinn Fein MLA Daithí McKay, a committee member, coaching developer Frank Cushnahan… on responses to committee questions, creating a perceived conflict of interest. McKay resigned from the party and Assembly, admitting the exchanges were inappropriate but denying corruption. Police investigations followed, but no charges were brought against McKay or other Sinn Fein figures for misconduct in public office…”
Defamatory as well as inaccurate
This is wildly wrong and defamatory. McKay was never accused of corruption, never engaged in coaching Cushnahan (who never even appeared before the committee) and was in fact charged with misconduct in public office over separate allegations, but was last year cleared by Belfast Crown Court.
In the same article, Grokipedia claims in relation to the Red Sky scandal that “Red Sky's director, DUP councillor Sammy Douglas, resigned amid allegations of cronyism”.
This again is wrong and defamatory. Douglas was never a director of Red Sky, as Companies House records make clear.
Had a newspaper made such claims, we'd be held accountable by the courts; Musk is so arrogant and so wealthy that he doesn't seem to care. A machine this inaccurate could wrongly label someone a paedophile or a sectarian murderer.
Other articles are even more cruelly damaging.
In an article on the UVF, it claims that the 1976 murder of the Reavey and O'Dowd family members involved people “believed linked to IRA activity” and then describes this as “erroneous intelligence identifying them as combatants”, saying “these civilian errors fuelled immediate republican reprisals, including the IRA's Kingsmill massacre”.
There were no links between those murdered and the IRA, and an inquest established that the Kingsmill massacre was not prompted by the previous day's slaughter.
In a long article on the late Ian Paisley, it claims he had “positive impacts on unionist resilience”, approvingly referring to his role in the Ulster Workers' Council strike which toppled the Sunningdale Agreement in 1974.
It doesn't mention that this strike involved unconstitutional methods whereby paramilitaries used violence and intimidation. Instead, Musk's website says that the strike halted “premature devolution with an Irish government role”.
It goes on to say that “Paisley faced frequent labelling as a sectarian bigot due to his theological opposition to Roman Catholicism, which detractors interpreted as ethnic prejudice fuelling hatred; sources like socialist publications and Irish nationalist media portrayed his stance as embodying reactionary Protestant supremacy that perpetuated division”, something it claims “overlooks the principled consistency of his critiques”.
That's one interpretation, but it's demonstrably not an objective one.
It goes on to say that “detractors argued Paisley's intransigence prolonged the conflict… outlets with nationalist sympathies claimed this rigidity denied Northern Ireland stability and economic progress.
“Empirically, however, his resistance correlated with the IRA's strategic defeat… and preserved Northern Ireland's integration within the UK, ensuring continued substantial block grant funding from Westminster that exceeded pre-Troubles levels adjusted for inflation, without concessions leading to unification. These critiques often emanate from media and academic sources exhibiting systemic biases favouring narratives of unionist obstruction over republican aggression.”
While puffed up with its own self-importance and denouncing others, it fails to see its own screaming errors.
Rewriting history, it claims that the 1969 Burntollet Bridge ambush of a People's Democracy march “exemplified the escalating tensions Paisley had foreseen” which “crystallised Protestant concerns over unchecked agitation threatening communal security”.
This is hopelessly distorted. In fact, Lord Cameron's commission which investigated this period found that the likelihood of disorder “was heightened by inflammatory speeches from various quarters and in particular from Dr Paisley” and that Paisley, along with his Ulster Protestant Volunteers, must “bear a heavy share of direct responsibility” for Burntollet.
Grokipedia's admiration for Paisley's unconstitutional methods doesn't stop there. It says that his 1980s Third Force was formed “not as an illegal paramilitary outfit but as a disciplined, accountable civilian reserve operating under Crown authority”. This is balderdash. The Third Force was a paramilitary group answerable to Paisley, which had nothing to do with the monarch.
It then claims that after the Good Friday Agreement Paisley led the DUP “in a prolonged boycott of Northern Ireland's devolved institutions”. In fact, not only did the DUP not boycott the Assembly, but it had two Executive ministers.
Grokipedia's article on Gerry Adams says: “Reports also suggest a brief stint as a clerical assistant in the Northern Ireland Civil Service”. In fact, Adams worked as a barman before full-time republican activities.
The same article claims that the Enniskillen bomb killed six children. It didn't; the youngest victim was 20.
It claims that Bobby Sands was elected MP in 1981 with 30.4% of the vote. Given that there were only two candidates, this would have been mathematically impossible. In fact, Sands got 51.2% of the vote.
In Grokipedia's main article on Northern Ireland, it says that “on Bloody Sunday, paratroopers killed 14 civilians… initially depicted by some media as unprovoked, though evidence revealed IRA gunfire and nail bombs”. This is the opposite of the truth. Initially, there were claims by the Army that the victims were violent, but evidence disproved this.
Other articles contain dangerous open-mindedness about murder. In an entry on loyalist assassin Michael Stone, it posits that “from a loyalist perspective, Stone's Milltown raid was hailed as a bold tit-for-tat response to IRA aggression, enhancing his status as an icon of defiance and boosting morale among Protestant extremists” while “republican assessments, however, framed the attack as indiscriminate terrorism against civilians”.
It claims that “mainstream reporting, while factually recounting events, occasionally reflects institutional biases favouring narratives of loyalist aggression”.
What sort of encyclopaedia equivocates on the legitimacy of slaughtering civilians during a funeral, while finding a way to somehow blame the media?
An article on Jeffrey Donaldson supposes that his time as a corporal in the UDR “involved rigorous training in operational logistics, risk assessment, and coordinated action, instilling a pragmatic orientation toward resource management and decentralized decision-making over centralized directives. Such experiences, set against the backdrop of 1980s policies promoting market efficiencies and fiscal restraint, contributed to a foundational scepticism of expansive state interventions in favour of incentivized individual and communal initiative”. This is gibberish. Donaldson's formative political years were shaped by the UUP in Kilkeel and then by Enoch Powell and James Molyneaux, along with his growing involvement in the Orange Order.
The nonsense goes on and on. Apparently when Donaldson defected to the DUP, he was “accompanied by two UUP research assistants, Arlene Foster and Norah Beare”. This is demeaningly inaccurate; Foster and Beare were MLAs — and Foster would quickly overtake Donaldson in the political hierarchy.
Even if you never go near this website, you're not immune from its wild inaccuracies. Two months ago, The Guardian reported that ChatGPT was frequently using Grokipedia as a source when answering questions, while Google, Microsoft and Perplexity's AI models have also reportedly relied on this deeply flawed site.
This technology is going to become more sophisticated and the howling errors will eventually be far harder to spot. That will be far more dangerous. At the heart of this technology is a black box into which questions go and out of which answers are given — but we're not allowed to see what precisely goes on inside that box and if there was deliberate interference to skew answers for political or other reasons, we'd have no way of knowing.
Grokipedia owner xAI did not respond to questions.
As growing numbers of people rely on AI chatbots to answer their queries, falsehoods are going to work their way into journalism, into academia and into political speeches, ultimately infecting the public record in ways which become almost impossible to undo.
In the world ahead, how will we know what's true?